UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                            Filed by a party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

HERON THERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

HERON THERAPEUTICS, INC.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders

to Be Held on June 18, 2019

To the Stockholders of Heron Therapeutics, Inc.:

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Heron Therapeutics, Inc. (“Heron,” “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our”), a Delaware corporation, will be held on June 18, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. local time at 4242 Campus Point Court, San Diego, CA 92121, for the following purposes, as more fully described in the accompanying Proxy Statement:

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 22, 2019 will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be available for inspection at our offices located at 4242 Campus Point Court, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92121 for at least ten days prior to the meeting and will also be available for inspection at the meeting.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

FOR THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON JUNE 18, 2019:

The 2019 Proxy Statement and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended

December 31, 2018 are available at: http://www.edocumentview.com/hrtx.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you expect to attend the meeting, you are urged to cast your vote as soon as possible. You may vote your shares via the Internet or via a toll-free telephone number by following the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, the proxy card or the voting instruction card, as applicable. In addition, if you received paper copies of the proxy materials by mail, you can also vote by mail by following the instructions on the proxy card or the voting instruction card. Submitting a proxy or voting instruction card will not prevent you from attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person, if you so desire. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote at the meeting, you must obtain from the record holder a proxy issued in your name.

HERON THERAPEUTICS, INC.

4242 Campus Point Court, Suite 200

San Diego, CA 92121

(858) 251-4400

PROXY STATEMENT

2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Why have these proxy materials been made available to me?

The enclosed proxy is being solicited on behalf of our Board of Directors (“Board”) for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 18, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. local time at 4242 Campus Point Court, San Diego, CA 92121, or at any adjournments or postponements thereof (“Annual Meeting”). The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and the proxy materials, including the 2019 Proxy Statement and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, will be made available online at http://www.edocumentview.com/hrtx and mailed to stockholders, as applicable, on or about May 9, 2019. We encourage stockholders to vote well before the Annual Meeting, even if they plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, via the Internet (as specified below and in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or the proxy card, as applicable) or by using the toll-free telephone number provided below or in the proxy card, as applicable. In addition, if you received copies of the proxy materials by mail, you can vote by mail by following the instructions on the proxy card. Stockholders who hold our shares in “street name” should refer to the voting instructions form provided by their broker, bank or other nominee for details on how to provide voting instructions to each person. For additional details, see “How can I vote at the Annual Meeting?” below.

Why did I receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials in the mail?

As permitted by rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we are making our proxy materials available to stockholders electronically via the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail to our stockholders of record containing instructions on how to access the proxy materials and vote by proxy over the Internet, by telephone or in person. All stockholders have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or request the delivery of a printed set of proxy materials. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.

Who can vote at the Annual Meeting?

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 22, 2019, the record date for the Annual Meeting, will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the record date, there were 79,194,227 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

1

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name

If at the close of business on the record date, your shares were registered directly in your name, then you are a stockholder of record. As a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting or vote via one of the methods described in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or in the proxy card if you received a hard or emailed copy of the proxy materials. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, we urge you to vote before the Annual Meeting to ensure your vote is counted.

Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or Other Agent

If at the close of business on the record date, your shares were held, not in your name, but rather in an account at a brokerage firm, bank or other agent, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or the proxy materials, as applicable, are being forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other agent. The broker, bank or other agent holding your account is considered to be the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting.

As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other agent on how to vote the shares in your account. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you request and obtain a valid proxy issued in your name from your broker, bank or other agent.

How can I attend the Annual Meeting?

You are entitled to attend the Annual Meeting only if you were a stockholder at the close of business on April 22, 2019, or you hold a valid proxy to vote at the meeting.

If your shares are held in the name of your broker, bank or other agent, you must obtain from the record holder a proxy issued in your name.

For directions to the Annual Meeting, you may contact the Company at (858) 251-4400.

What am I voting on?

There are six Company proposals scheduled for a vote at the Annual Meeting:

2

What are my voting choices and what are the Board’s recommendations?

For Proposal 1, you may vote “For” or “Against” or “Abstain” from voting for each director nominee. For Proposals 2 and 3, you may vote “For” or “Against” or “Abstain” from voting. For Proposal 4, you may vote “For” every “One Year,” “Two Years,” “Three Years” or “Abstain” from voting. For Proposals 5 and 6, you may vote “For” or “Against” or “Abstain” from voting.

The Board recommends that you vote “For” each of the director nominees named in Proposal 1, “For” each of Proposals 2 and 3, “For” every “One Year” in Proposal 4 and “For” each of Proposals 5 and 6.

What if another matter is properly brought before the Annual Meeting?

At this time, the Board of Directors knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matter is properly brought before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the proxy card as “proxies” to vote on those matters in accordance with their best judgment and in their discretion.

How can I vote at the Annual Meeting?

The procedures for voting are as follows:

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name

3

Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of Broker, Bank or Other Agent

If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank or other agent, you should have received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or a proxy card and voting instructions with the proxy materials from that institution rather than from us. Simply follow the instructions in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials received from your broker, bank or other agent to vote on the Internet or by telephone or, if you received a proxy card by mail, complete, sign and return the proxy card to ensure that your vote is counted. To vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from your broker, bank or other agent. Follow the instructions from your broker, bank or other agent included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or with the proxy materials, or contact your broker, bank or other agent to request a proxy form.

We provide Internet proxy voting to allow you to vote your shares online, with procedures designed to ensure the authenticity and correctness of your proxy vote instructions. However, please be aware that you must bear any costs associated with your Internet access, such as usage charges from Internet access providers.

How many votes do I have?

On each matter to be voted on, you have one vote for each share of common stock you own as of the close of business on April 22, 2019, the record date for the Annual Meeting.

Who is paying for this proxy solicitation?

We will pay for the entire cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to the mailed Notices of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and/or proxy materials, our directors and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by other means of communication. Directors and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies. We may also reimburse brokerage firms, banks and other agents for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners.

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card?

If you receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card, your shares are registered in more than one name or are registered in different accounts. Please follow the voting instructions in each Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or complete, sign and return each proxy card to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

4

Can I revoke or change my vote after submitting my proxy?

Yes. You can revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the applicable vote deadlines for the Annual Meeting. If you are the record holder of your shares, you may revoke your proxy in any one of four ways:

Your most current proxy card or Internet proxy is the one that is counted.

If your shares are held by your broker, bank or other agent, you should follow the instructions provided by them.

How can I submit a proposal (including a director nomination) for next year’s annual meeting?

Under the rules of the SEC, stockholders who wish to submit proposals for inclusion in the Proxy Statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must submit such proposals to our Corporate Secretary so as to be received by us at 4242 Campus Point Court, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92121, by close of business on or before January 10, 2020.

If a stockholder intends to make a nomination or present a proposal for other business (other than pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the stockholder must deliver written notice to our Corporate Secretary at the address provided above not earlier than February 19, 2020 and not later than March 20, 2020. Such nomination(s) or proposal(s) may or may not be included in the Proxy Statement. If the date of the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders changes by more than 30 calendar days from the anniversary of the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, then stockholder notice must be received not later than the close of business on the later of: (i) the 90th calendar day prior to such annual meeting; or (ii) the 10th calendar day following the day on which public disclosure of the date of such meeting is first made.

Any stockholder proposal must be a proper matter for stockholder action and must comply either with Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act or the terms and conditions set forth in our By-laws, as applicable.

What are “broker non-votes”?

If your shares are held by your broker, bank or other agent as your nominee (that is, in “street name”), you will need to obtain a proxy form from the institution that holds your shares and follow the instructions included on that form regarding how to instruct your broker, bank or other agent to vote your shares. If you do not give instructions to your broker, bank or other agent, they

5

can vote your shares with respect to “routine” items, but not with respect to “non-routine” items. On non-routine items for which you do not give instructions to your broker, bank or other agent, the shares will be treated as broker non-votes. The only “routine” proposal that is being presented at this Annual Meeting is Proposal 2 (ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm).

How are votes counted and how many votes are needed to approve each proposal?

Votes will be counted by the inspector of elections appointed for the meeting.

6

What is the quorum requirement?

A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. A quorum will be present if at least a majority of the shares issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting as of the close of business on the record date are represented by stockholders present at the meeting or by proxy. At the close of business on the record date, there were 79,194,227 shares outstanding and entitled to vote.

Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted towards the quorum requirement. If there is no quorum, a majority of the votes present at the meeting may adjourn the meeting to another date.

How can I find out the results of the voting at the Annual Meeting?

Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. In addition, final voting results will be published in a Current Report on Form 8-K that we expect to file within four business days after the Annual Meeting. If final voting results are not available to us in time to file a Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days after the Annual Meeting, we intend to file a Form 8-K to publish preliminary results and, within four business days after the final results are known to us, file an additional Form 8-K to publish the final results.

7

INFORMATION CONCERNING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Certain information regarding each of our nominees, including each nominee’s age, experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led the Board to conclude that the individual should serve on the Board and each nominee’s principal occupation and directorships during the past five years, is set forth below:

Kevin Tang has served as a director of Heron since 2009 and as Chairman since 2012. Mr. Tang has more than 25 years of experience evaluating, creating and building biotechnology companies that are focused on developing treatments for life-threatening and debilitating diseases and conditions. Since 2013, Mr. Tang has served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Odonate Therapeutics, Inc., a pharmaceutical company dedicated to the development of best-in-class therapeutics that improve and extend the lives of patients with cancer. Mr. Tang also serves as the President of Tang Capital Management, LLC, a life sciences-focused investment company he founded in 2002. Since 2014, Mr. Tang has served as a director and Chairman of La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company. From 2009 through its acquisition by Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in 2010, he served as a director of Penwest Pharmaceuticals Co. In 2006, Mr. Tang co-founded Ardea Biosciences, Inc. and served as a director from inception through its acquisition by AstraZeneca PLC in 2012. From 2001 to 2008, he was a director of Trimeris, Inc. From 1993 to 2001, Mr. Tang held various positions at Deutsche Banc Alex Brown, Inc., an investment banking firm, most recently serving as Managing Director and head of the firm’s Life Sciences research group. Mr. Tang received a B.S. degree from Duke University. The Board has concluded that Mr. Tang should serve as a director based on his experience forming and building biotechnology companies, serving as a director of numerous biotechnology companies and serving as a manager of funds specializing in the area of life sciences.

Barry Quart, Pharm.D. has served as a director of Heron since 2012. Dr. Quart was appointed Chief Executive Officer of the Company in 2013 and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company in February 2019. Dr. Quart has more than 25 years of experience serving in leadership positions in biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies and developing innovative pharmaceutical products. In 2006, Dr. Quart co-founded Ardea Biosciences, Inc. and served as its President and Chief Executive Officer from its inception through 2013 and as a director through its acquisition by AstraZeneca PLC in 2012. Previously, he was with Pfizer Inc. as Senior Vice President of Pfizer Global Research and Development, and the director of Pfizer’s La Jolla Laboratories. Prior to Pfizer’s acquisition of the Warner-Lambert Company, Dr. Quart was President of Research and Development at Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a division of the Warner-Lambert Company. Dr. Quart joined Agouron in 1993 and was instrumental in the development and registration of Viracept^® (nelfinavir). Dr. Quart also served as a director of Synageva Biopharma Corp. from 2012 through its acquisition by Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in 2015. Since 2015, Dr. Quart has served as a director of Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., a biopharmaceutical company. Dr. Quart received a Pharm.D. degree from the University of California, San Francisco. The Board has concluded that Dr. Quart’s should serve as a director based on

8

his experience in senior management and as a director with other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies and his prior drug development experience.

Craig Johnson has served as a director of Heron since 2014. Mr. Johnson has more than 25 years of experience serving in senior financial management roles and governing corporations, primarily in the biotechnology industry. Mr. Johnson has also served as a director of Odonate Therapeutics, Inc. since 2017, Mirati Therapeutics, Inc. since 2013 and La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company since 2013. Mr. Johnson also served as a director of Ardea Biosciences, Inc. from 2008 through its acquisition by AstraZeneca PLC in 2012, Adamis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Inc. from 2011 to 2014 and GenomeDx Biosciences, Inc. from 2015 to 2018. From 2004 through its acquisition by Raptor Pharmaceuticals Corp in 2009, he served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TorreyPines Therapeutics, Inc. and, from 2009 to 2019, as Vice President of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Raptor Pharmaceutical Corp. From 1994 to 2004, Mr. Johnson held various positions at MitoKor, Inc., most recently as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Operations. Prior to 1994, Mr. Johnson held senior financial positions with several early-stage technology companies and also practiced as a Certified Public Accountant with Price Waterhouse. Mr. Johnson received a B.B.A. degree in accounting from the University of Michigan-Dearborn. The Board has concluded that Mr. Johnson should serve as a director based on his experience as an executive officer and as a director of numerous life sciences companies.

John Poyhonen has served as a director of Heron since 2014. Mr. Poyhonen has more than 25 years of experience serving in leadership positions in biotechnology, pharmaceutical and food ingredient companies and commercializing innovative products. From 2014 through its acquisition by Firmenich, Inc. in November 2018, Mr. Poyhonen was the President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Senomyx, Inc. He joined Senomyx, Inc. in 2003 as Vice President and Chief Business Officer; was promoted in 2004 to Vice President and Chief Financial and Business Officer; was named Senior Vice President, Chief Financial and Business Officer in 2006; was promoted to President and Chief Operating Officer in 2009; and promoted to President and Chief Executive Officer in 2014. From 1996 to 2003, Mr. Poyhonen served in various sales and marketing positions for Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., most recently as Vice President of National Sales. Prior to holding this position, Mr. Poyhonen served as Vice President of Marketing and Vice President of National Accounts. He was previously a director of Ardea Biosciences, Inc. from 2007 through its acquisition by AstraZeneca PLC in 2012. Mr. Poyhonen received a B.A. degree in marketing from Michigan State University and a M.B.A. degree from the University of Kansas. The Board has concluded that Mr. Poyhonen should serve as a director based on his senior management experience in corporate and commercial strategy, business development, risk management, finance and operations.

Christian Waage has served as a director of Heron since 2016. Mr. Waage has more than 15 years of regulatory, legal and financial transaction experience primarily in the biotechnology industry. Since 2017, Mr. Waage has served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Gossamer Bio, Inc., a publicly traded biotechnology company. From 2013 to 2016, Mr. Waage held various positions at Receptos, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Celgene Corporation, most recently serving as Managing Director. Prior to its acquisition by Celgene Corporation in 2015, Mr. Waage served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Receptos, Inc. From 2012 through its acquisition by Vista Equity Partners LLC in 2013, he served as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at Websense, Inc. From 2008 through its acquisition by AstraZeneca PLC in 2012, Mr. Waage served as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Ardea Biosciences, Inc. Prior to 2008, Mr. Waage served as a partner at DLA Piper LLP. Mr. Waage received a J.D. from the University of San Diego School of Law and a B.A. degree in economics from the University of California, San Diego. The Board has concluded that Mr. Waage should serve as a director based on his experience in regulatory, legal and finance matters.

9

INFORMATION CONCERNING EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND KEY EMPLOYEES

Executive officers are elected by our Board and hold office until the earlier of resignation, removal or the appointment and election of a successor.

Our executive officers and their ages and positions as of April 22, 2019 are as follows:

Barry Quart, Pharm.D. Dr. Quart’s background is described above under “Information Concerning the Board of Directors.”

Kimberly Manhard joined us as Executive Vice President, Drug Development in 2016. Ms. Manhard served as a director of Heron from 2014 until she joined the management team. Ms. Manhard has more than 25 years of experience in drug development, regulatory affairs and pharmaceutical operations. From 2008 to 2016, Ms. Manhard served as the Senior Vice President of Regulatory Affairs and Development Operations at Ardea Biosciences, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of AstraZeneca PLC. In her role at Ardea, Ms. Manhard was instrumental in the development and 2015 regulatory approval of Zurampic^® (lesinurad) for the treatment of hyperuricemia associated with gout. Prior to joining Ardea in 2006, Ms. Manhard was President of her own consultancy firm, Vice President of Regulatory Affairs for Exelixis, Inc. and held multiple regulatory positions at Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a division of the Warner-Lambert Company, supporting development and commercialization of anticancer and antiviral products, including Viracept^® (nelfinavir). She was also previously with Bristol-Myers Squibb Company in regulatory affairs, responsible for oncology compounds, including Taxol^® (paclitaxel) and infectious disease compounds, including Videx^® (didanosine) and Zerit^® (stavudine). Ms. Manhard began her industry career in clinical research with Eli Lilly and Company and G.H. Besselaar Associates (Covance Inc.). Ms. Manhard received a B.S. degree in zoology and a B.A. degree in French from the University of Florida.

Robert Hoffman joined us as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Finance in 2017. Mr. Hoffman has more than 20 years of experience in financial management. From 2016 to 2017, Mr. Hoffman served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company. Prior to joining Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mr. Hoffman was Chief Financial Officer of AnaptysBio, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, from 2015 until 2016. He was part of the founding management team of Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in 1997, a biopharmaceutical company, ultimately serving as Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer until March 2011, and then again from August 2011 until July 2015. From March 2011 to August 2011, he served as Chief Financial Officer for Polaris Group, a biopharmaceutical company. Mr. Hoffman is a member of the board of directors of Kura Oncology, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, DelMar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, Aravive, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, and ASLAN Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company. He also is a member of the Financial Accounting Standards

10

Board’s Small Business Advisory Committee and is a member of the steering committee of the Association of Bioscience Financial Officers. Mr. Hoffman received his B.B.A. from St. Bonaventure University and is licensed as a C.P.A. (inactive) in the State of California.

Our other key employees and theirs ages and positions as of April 22, 2019 are as follows:

Paul Blake, M.D. joined us as Chief Medical Officer in December 2017. Dr. Blake has more than 25 years of experience in clinical research and medical affairs. From January 2017 to November 2017, Dr. Blake served as Senior Vice President of Clinical, Medical, and Regulatory Affairs at BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. From 2014 to 2016, Dr. Blake served as Chief Development Officer at Oxford BioMedica PLC. From 2007 to 2014, Dr. Blake served as Chief Medical Officer and Senior Vice President of Clinical Research and Development at Aeterna Zentaris Inc. Dr. Blake has also held various leadership positions in biopharmaceutical companies, including Cephalon, Inc. and SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Over his career, Dr. Blake has contributed to more than 40 NDAs and sNDAs, including products for the treatment of pain such as Relafen^® (nabumetone), a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that reduces hormones that cause pain and inflammation, and Fentora^®(fentanyl), an opioid pain medication. Other drugs that Dr. Blake has been involved in developing include Kytril^® (granisetron), Tenormin^® (atenolol), Zestril^® (lisinopril), Paxil^®(paroxetine), Coreg^® (carvedilol), Havrix^® (hepatitis A vaccine), Hycamtin^® (topotecan), Famvir^® (famciclovir), Requip^® (ropinirole), Avandia^® (rosiglitazone) and Provigil^® (modafinil). Dr. Blake is qualified in medicine from the Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London University. He is a Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, a Fellow of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Medicine of the Royal College of Physicians and a Fellow of the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.

Thomas Ottoboni, Ph.D. joined us as Vice President of Pharmaceutical Development in 2012. Dr. Ottoboni was promoted to Senior Vice President of Pharmaceutical and Preclinical Research and Development in 2014 and promoted to Chief Scientific Officer and Senior Vice President of Pharmaceutical and Translational Sciences in January 2019. Dr. Ottoboni has more than 20 years of drug development experience. From 2010 until 2011, Dr. Ottoboni was Vice President of Research and Development at Talima Therapeutics, Inc., where he worked on the development of a drug delivery implant to treat onychomycosis.

11

From 1996 to 2008, Dr. Ottoboni served as Executive Vice President of Strategy and Operations at POINT Biomedical Corp., where he developed several imaging and drug delivery systems. From 1994 through 1996, Dr. Ottoboni served as Manager of Systems Development and Drug Delivery Research for InSite Vision Inc., where he developed ophthalmic pharmaceutical delivery systems. He previously served as Director of Drug Delivery at Vitaphore Corp. Dr. Ottoboni is an inventor on more than 20 U.S. patents in organic and macromolecular chemistry. He received a B.S. degree in chemistry and a Ph.D. in organic chemistry from the University of California, Berkeley.

David Szekeres joined us as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Business Development, and Corporate Secretary in 2016. Mr. Szekeres has more than 15 years of legal and financial experience, primarily in the biotechnology industry. From 2014 to 2015, Mr. Szekeres served as General Counsel, Chief Business Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, and Corporate Secretary at Regulus Therapeutics Inc. In that role, Mr. Szekeres played a critical role in overseeing the company’s business, financial and legal responsibilities as it developed into a clinical-stage corporation. From 2008 through its acquisition by Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. in 2014, Mr. Szekeres served as Head of Mergers and Acquisitions, Governance and Securities and Assistant Corporate Secretary at Life Technologies Corporation. From 2001 to 2006, Mr. Szekeres served as Corporate Attorney at a number of law firms, including O’Melveny & Myers LLP and Latham & Watkins LLP. Prior to 2001, Mr. Szekeres served as Senior Associate in Investment Banking at investment bank Robertson Stephens. Mr. Szekeres is a member of the board of trustees for the Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Institute. Mr. Szekeres received a B.A. degree from the University of California, Irvine and a J.D. degree from Duke University School of Law.

Michael Mathews joined us as the Senior Vice President of the Pain Franchise in 2017. Mr. Mathews has more than 25 years of life sciences experience in sales and marketing. From 2015 to 2017, Mr. Mathews served as the Vice President for Acute Care at Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals. From 2012 to 2014, Mr. Mathews served as Senior Vice President International at KCI, an Acelity L.P. Inc. company. Mr. Mathews has also held various leadership positions at Bayer AG, including Senior Vice President North America for Diabetes Care and Head of Hematology for the Specialty Medicine Division, where he led the sales and marketing efforts of Bayer Aspirin, both in the U.S. and globally. Mr. Mathews was a member of Bayer AG’s Global Leadership Circle, which consisted of the top 250 executives globally. Mr. Mathews completed Stanford University’s graduate school executive program. He also holds an MBA from Thunderbird American School of International Management in international marketing, and a B.S. in international economics, finance and commerce from the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University.

Jesse Hollingsworth joined us as the Vice President of Oncology Sales in 2013 and was promoted to Senior Vice President of the Oncology Franchise in November 2018. Mr. Hollingsworth has more than 20 years of life sciences experience in sales and marketing. From 2011 to 2013, Mr. Hollingsworth was the Executive Director, Group Purchasing Organization and Trade at Dendreon Pharmaceuticals LLC, where he was responsible for the development and implementation of Dendreon’s clinic and hospital contracting strategy, as well as building and leading a team of national group purchasing organization and trade directors. Mr. Hollingsworth has also held various leadership positions at Amgen Inc. and ION Solutions. He received his B.S. at the University of Florida and his Master of Health Administration from the University of South Florida.

Chris Storgard joined us as Senior Vice President, Clinical Development in November 2018. Dr. Storgard has more than 25 years of experience in clinical research. Prior to joining Heron Therapeutics, Dr. Storgard served as Chief Medical Officer at Fate Therapeutics, since June 2016. From 2013 to 2016, Dr. Storgard served as Vice President of Clinical Research and

12

Development at Ardea Biosciences, a member of the AstraZeneca Group, leading the ZURAMPIC^® global clinical program to successful U.S. and European regulatory approvals. Dr. Storgard has also held various senior leadership positions at Biogen-Idec and Amgen, leading biologic and small molecule development programs within inflammation and oncology. From 2001 to 2004, Dr. Storgard served as Senior Associate Consultant, Division of Rheumatology, and Assistant Professor and Member of the Molecular Medicine Program at the Mayo School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Minnesota. He received his B.S. degree in biology and his M.D. from the University of Saskatchewan. Dr. Storgard completed a fellowship in rheumatology at Scripps Clinic and Research Center, San Diego.

Anita Gupta, D.O., Pharm.D., joined us as Senior Vice President of Medical Strategy and Government Affairs in 2017 and is a board-certified anesthesiologist and internationally recognized pain specialist. From 2012 to 2017, Dr. Gupta was Vice Chair, Division of Pain Medicine and Regional Anesthesiology in the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at Drexel University College of Medicine and Assistant Professor, Division of Pain Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. Dr. Gupta also served as an anesthesiologist at both Johns Hopkins University and Washington Hospital Center. Dr. Gupta was a Food and Drug Administration Special Government Employee from 2015 to 2018 during which time she served as a member of the FDA’s Anesthetic and Analgesic Drug Products Advisory Committee. From 2016 to 2018, Dr. Gupta served as a director of Amorsa Therapeutics, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company. Dr. Gupta received a B.S. degree and a Pharm.D. degree from Rutgers University College of Pharmacy, a D.O. degree from the University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey, and a MPP and HHP from Princeton University’s Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs. She completed a residency in anesthesiology at Georgetown University, a fellowship in interventional pain management at Johns Hopkins University and clinical scientist training in toxicology at the National Institutes of Health.

John Arthur, Ph.D. joined us as Vice President of Manufacturing and Supply in April 2017. Dr. Arthur has more than 20 years of experience in pharmaceutical manufacturing. From 2013 to 2016, Dr. Arthur was Vice President of Manufacturing and CMC at Mast Therapeutics, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, where he led all CMC activities for multiple Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical programs. From 2012 to 2013, Dr. Arthur was Senior Director of Manufacturing at Auspex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company. Prior to his role at Auspex, Dr. Arthur held several positions of increasing responsibility at various biopharmaceutical companies, including Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Kanisa Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Salmedix, Inc., Prometheus Laboratories Inc., Maxim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Arthur received a B.S. in Biochemistry from Western Washington University, a Ph.D. in organic chemistry from the University of South Carolina, Columbia and conducted his postdoctoral research at Michigan State University.

Sean Ristine joined us as Senior Director of Human Resources in 2014 and was promoted to Vice President of Human Resources in 2015. Mr. Ristine has more than 20 years of experience in human resources and business leadership. From 2009 to 2014, Mr. Ristine held key Human Resources positions at Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc., most recently as Senior Director of Human Resources and was instrumental in that function as Cadence grew to a commercial-stage company with more than 200 employees located throughout the U.S. From 2004 to 2009, Mr. Ristine held Human Resources management roles of increasing responsibility at Kyocera Wireless Corp., including Director of Human Resources and Facilities. Prior to this, from 1995 to 2004, Mr. Ristine held positions at Kyocera America, Inc. including Manager of Human Resources. Mr. Ristine received a B.S. degree in Business and Organization Behavior from Brigham Young University and an M.B.A. degree with an emphasis in Human Resources Management from San Diego State University.

There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

13

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our Board met four times during the year ended December 31, 2018. Each member of the Board attended 75% or more of the aggregate number of Board and Board committee meetings held during the period for which he was a director during 2018 and served on such committees. We have a policy of encouraging all directors to attend the Annual Meeting; three of the six then-serving directors attended the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in person.

Board Independence

On an annual basis, the Board reviews the independence of all directors in light of each director’s (or any family member’s, if applicable) affiliations with the Company and members of management, as well as significant holdings of the Company’s securities. The Board uses the definition of independence from The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) listing standards to assess independence of our directors. The Nasdaq rules have objective tests and a subjective test for determining who is an “independent director.” Under the objective tests, a director cannot be considered independent if:

The subjective test states that an independent director must be a person who lacks a relationship that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The Board has not established categorical standards or guidelines to make these subjective determinations, but considers all relevant facts and circumstances. Our Board has determined that Messrs. Tang, Johnson, Poyhonen and Waage are “independent directors” as defined by Nasdaq rules. Dr. Quart is not deemed to be independent under Nasdaq rules by virtue of his current employment with the Company. Our former President, Robert Rosen, who served as director until February 5, 2019, was not deemed to be independent under Nasdaq rules by virtue of his employment with the Company during the time he served on the Board.

14

In addition to the Board-level standards for director independence, the directors who serve on the Audit Committee each satisfy standards established by Nasdaq and the SEC, as no member of the Audit Committee accepts directly or indirectly any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the Company other than their director compensation, or otherwise has an affiliate relationship with the Company. Similarly, the members of the Compensation Committee each qualify as independent under Nasdaq standards. Under these standards, the Board considered that none of the members of the Compensation Committee accept directly or indirectly any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the Company other than their director compensation, and that none have any affiliate relationships with the Company or other relationships that would impair the director’s judgment as a member of the Compensation Committee.

Board Committees

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is composed of three directors: Messrs. Johnson, Poyhonen and Waage. The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, overseeing and replacing, if necessary, our independent registered public accounting firm and for evaluating its work. The Audit Committee also assists the Board in overseeing the integrity of our financial statements and accounting and financial reporting processes, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence and the performance of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and internal audit function. During 2018, the Audit Committee received written disclosures from and communicated with the independent registered public accounting firm; met with management and the independent registered public accounting firm to discuss our financial statements; met with the independent registered public accounting firm to discuss matters that may affect our financial statements; approved related-party transactions, if any; provided oversight of risk management; and approved professional services provided to us by the independent public accountants. The Audit Committee, together with the Board, was also responsible for reviewing our plans for providing appropriate financial resources to sustain our operations, including review of our strategic corporate plan and annual operating budget. The Board has determined that, during 2018, all members of the Audit Committee satisfied applicable independence standards promulgated by Nasdaq and the SEC, and the Board has determined that Mr. Johnson qualifies as the “audit committee financial expert” (as the SEC has defined such term in Item 407 of Regulation S-K). We have adopted an Audit Committee charter, which is available at www.herontx.com. The Audit Committee met four times during the year ended December 31, 2018.

Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee is composed of three directors: Messrs. Poyhonen, Johnson and Tang. The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company’s compensation philosophy generally and advising the Board regarding the compensation of the Board, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and the other executive officers of the Company. The Compensation Committee seeks to align our compensation practices with sound fiscal policy and enable the Company to attract and motivate qualified and highly skilled personnel, and is responsible for overseeing the Company’s management resources, succession planning, and management development activities. In 2018, the Compensation Committee administered our benefit and equity incentive plans, and made recommendations to the Board regarding the review and administration of all compensation arrangements for executive officers (including the Chief Executive Officer, as well as our former President, Mr. Rosen) and the review and establishment of general policies relating to the compensation and benefits of our officers and employees for the year ended December 31, 2018. The Compensation Committee also reviewed and approved corporate goals for our executive officers and evaluated their performance in light of these goals, and reviewed and made recommendations to the Board regarding the compensation paid to the non-employee directors. Subject to applicable laws, the Compensation Committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees, each consisting of one or more of its

15

members, with such powers as the Compensation Committee confers. The Board has determined that, during 2018, all members of the Compensation Committee satisfied applicable Nasdaq independence standards. We have adopted a Compensation Committee charter, which is available at www.herontx.com. The Compensation Committee met three times during the year ended December 31, 2018.

Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (“Governance Committee”), is composed of three directors: Messrs. Tang, Johnson and Waage. The Governance Committee is responsible for setting a process for identifying and evaluating nominees and recommending a slate of director nominees to be proposed by the Board to the stockholders (or any director nominees to be elected by the Board to fill interim vacancies), consistent with the criteria approved by the Board. The Governance Committee also is responsible for establishing and maintaining a policy under which the Company’s stockholders may recommend a candidate to the Governance Committee for consideration for nomination as a director. Procedures for the consideration of director nominees recommended by stockholders are set forth below. In addition, the Governance Committee is responsible for recommending directors for membership on Board committees. The Governance Committee also is responsible for reviewing and recommending updates to our Code of Ethics as well as any written corporate governance guidelines. The Board has determined that, during 2018, all members of the Governance Committee satisfied applicable Nasdaq independence standards. We have adopted a Governance Committee charter, which is available at www.herontx.com. The Governance Committee met one time during the year ended December 31, 2018.

Pain Franchise Commercial Committee. In December 2018, in connection with our preparation for the anticipated commercial launch of HTX-011, our investigational agent for the management of postoperative pain, the Board established a temporary Pain Franchise Commercial Committee that is responsible for overseeing and monitoring the Company’s commercial launch efforts related to HTX-011 and any future pain management drug candidates that we might develop (“Pain Committee”). Mr. Poyhonen is the Chairman and sole member of the Pain Committee.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

In July 2017, Mr. Rosen, our former President and former member of the Board, joined the Board of Directors of Odonate Therapeutics, Inc. where Mr. Tang serves as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. During the year ended December 31, 2018, none of our executive officers, other than Mr. Rosen, served as a member of the Board of Directors of another entity where such entity’s executive officers served on our Board. Mr. Rosen retired from his roles as President and member of the Board in February 2019.

Board Leadership Structure

The role of our Chairman of the Board is separate from the Chief Executive Officer. The Board has determined that its structure is appropriate at this time given the Company’s specific characteristics and circumstances, including the Board’s commitment to independent Board and Committee leadership, and to fulfill the Board’s duties effectively and efficiently so that our business receives the undivided attention of the Chief Executive Officer.

16

Director Nomination

Criteria for Board Membership

The Governance Committee is responsible for assessing the appropriate balance of experience, skills and other characteristics required of our directors. Nominees for director are selected based on their experience, knowledge, integrity, understanding of our business environment, specific skills and perspectives they may possess that are helpful to the Company and the willingness to devote adequate time to Board duties. The Governance Committee uses the same selection criteria regardless of whether the candidate has been recommended by a stockholder or identified by the Board. In selecting candidates to recommend to the Board for appointment or re-election to the Board, the Governance Committee considers the current composition of the Board and the attributes and capabilities of the current directors in order to achieve appropriate balance of experience, skills and other characteristics. The Governance Committee also considers potential independence under the rules of Nasdaq, with the additional objective that at least one director qualifies as “financial expert” under the rules of the SEC. When evaluating a candidate for our Board, the Governance Committee does not assign specific weight to any of these factors, nor does the Governance Committee believe that all of the criteria must necessarily apply to every candidate. At minimum, a director’s qualifications and attributes, in light of the above-mentioned criteria, are considered each time the director is nominated or re-nominated for Board membership.

Board Diversity

While we do not have a formal written policy regarding diversity in identifying director candidates, the Company believes that a Board comprising directors with diverse backgrounds, experiences, skills and perspectives contributes to overall Board effectiveness and improves Board decision making. The Governance Committee is committed to continuing to enhance the Board’s diversity by identifying potential director candidates with varied attributes and perspectives. Accordingly, the Governance Committee actively considers diversity in its development of the pool from which it identifies qualified director candidates who possess the experience and skills desired for our Board. The Governance Committee looks to incorporate diversity into the Board across a broad spectrum of factors, including race, gender, ethnicity, skills, experiences, specific operational experience and viewpoints, all with a view to identify candidates that can assist the Board with the performance of is governance and oversight role, in light of the Company’s strategy and evolving needs. The Governance Committee believes that our current Board reflects a diverse mix of directors on a number of these factors. The Governance Committee evaluates the diversity of the Board as part of the annual nomination process and assesses the effectiveness of its approach to Board diversity as part of the Board and committee evaluation process.

Stockholder Recommendations

It is the Governance Committee’s policy, as described below, to consider written recommendations from stockholders for nominees for director. The Governance Committee considers persons recommended by our stockholders in the same manner as a nominee recommended by our Board members, management or a third-party executive search firm. Any such recommendations should be submitted to the Governance Committee, c/o the Secretary, and should include the following information: (i) all information relating to such nominee that is required to be disclosed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act (including such person’s written consent to being named in the Proxy Statement as a nominee and to serving as a director, if elected); (ii) the names and addresses of the stockholders making the nomination and the number of shares of our

17

common stock which are owned beneficially and of record by such stockholders; and (iii) appropriate biographical information and a statement as to the qualification of the nominee. Stockholders seeking to recommend a prospective nominee should follow the instructions under the heading “Communications with Directors” below. The Board did not receive any stockholder recommendations during the year ended December 31, 2018.

Process for Identifying and Evaluating Nominees

The Board believes we are well served by our current directors who provide the Board with experience, skills and characteristics that the Board has determined meet its requirements with respect to experience, knowledge, integrity, understanding of our business environment, specific skills that are helpful to the Company and the willingness to devote adequate time to Board duties. The Board, following the recommendation of our Governance Committee, determined that the five incumbent director nominees are best-suited to continue to serve our needs, given our Company’s current anticipated activities.

Oversight of Risk Management

Our Board is responsible for oversight of our risk management policies and procedures. We are exposed to a number of risks, including financial risks, strategic, operational and commercial risks and risks relating to regulatory and legal compliance. The Board will regularly discuss with management our major risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including the guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and risk management are undertaken, and highlighting any new risks that may have arisen since they last met.

The Board manages exposure risks within various areas including: (i) risks relating to our employment policies, executive compensation plans and arrangements; (ii) financial risks and taking appropriate actions to help ensure quality financial reporting and appropriately conservative investment practices; (iii) risks associated with the independence of the Board and potential conflicts of interest; and (iv) commercial risks. The Audit Committee reviews policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management and reviews with the Company’s general counsel, who would also consult with outside counsel as appropriate, any legal matter that could have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements. The Audit Committee also reviews policies with respect to financial risk and makes recommendations to the Board. The Board’s administration of its risk oversight function has not affected the Board’s leadership structure, which separates the roles of our Chairman of the Board and our Chief Executive Officer.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH DIRECTORS

Stockholders and other interested parties who wish to communicate with any director or committee of our Board may do so using the procedures detailed in the Corporate Governance section of the Investor Resources page on our website at www.herontx.com.

CODE OF ETHICS

We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to our Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and to all of our other officers, directors and employees. The Code of Ethics is available in the Corporate Governance section of the Investor Resources page on our website at www.herontx.com. We intend to disclose future waivers or material amend-

18

ments to certain provisions of our Code of Ethics on the above-referenced website within four business days following the date of such waiver or amendment. To the extent permissible under Nasdaq rules, if we make any amendments to the Code of Ethics or grant any waiver, including implicit waiver, from a provision of the Code of Ethics to a director or executive officer we intend to disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver in the manner set forth in the Code of Ethics on our website.

19

SECURITY OWNERSHIP BY CERTAIN BENEFICIAL HOLDERS

The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock by: (i) each person known to us to own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock; (ii) each of our directors; (iii) each of our Named Executive Officers; and (iv) all current directors and executive officers, as a group. The number of shares reported in the table below is as of April 22, 2019, except as otherwise noted below, and is based on filings with the SEC or other information of which we are aware. The information in this table is based solely on statements in filings with the SEC or other reliable information included in the Company’s records. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each of the named individuals is c/o Heron Therapeutics, Inc., 4242 Campus Point Court, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92121. The percentage of ownership is based on 79,194,227 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of April 22, 2019. Beneficial ownership of shares is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting and investment power with respect to the shares. Shares of common stock subject to outstanding options and warrants and shares of common stock underlying convertible notes that are exercisable or convertible, as the case may be, within 60 days of April 22, 2019 are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of ownership of the person holding such options, warrants or convertible notes, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. Except as otherwise noted, each person or entity has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown.

20

21

22

23

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

Related Person Transactions Policies

Pursuant to our Code of Ethics, our executive officers, directors and employees must disclose transactions involving actual or apparent conflicts of interest, such as related person transactions, to the Chairman of the Board. Additionally, the Audit Committee is responsible for review and approval of all related person transactions in which any officer, director or stockholder has a direct or indirect interest and would be required to be disclosed under Item 404(a) of SEC Regulation S-K, and has written policies and procedures for reviewing, approving or ratifying any transaction required to be reported under Item 404(a) of SEC Regulation S-K. In reviewing related person transactions, the Audit Committee evaluates any transaction in which the Company was or is to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which the “related person” (as defined in Item 404(a) of SEC Regulation S-K) had, or will have, a direct or indirect material interest. The Audit Committee also will consider whether the proposed terms are at least as favorable to the Company as could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties and will confirm that there is a bona fide business purpose for the transaction. There were no related person transactions since the beginning of the Company’s last completed fiscal year that require disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and SEC rules, each person who, at any time during 2018, was a director, executive officer or beneficial owner of more than 10% of any class of equity security (“Reporting Person”) is required to file periodic reports of his or her ownership, and changes in that ownership, with the SEC. Beneficial owners of more than 10% of any class of equity security file their own reports with the SEC. Based solely on our review of copies of these reports and representations of such reporting persons, we believe that during the year ended December, 31 2018, all Reporting Persons satisfied such applicable SEC filing requirements.

24

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview

The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the material elements of compensation earned in 2018 by each of the executive officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table below, who are referred to collectively as our “Named Executive Officers.” Our Named Executive Officers with respect to 2018 were:

These persons constitute our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, our only other executive officer, and our former President, all serving during 2018. Mr. Rosen retired from the Company in February 2019, and Dr. Quart assumed the role of President on Mr. Rosen’s retirement. The 2018 compensation discussion provided below includes payments that were made in 2019 when such payments related to performance in 2018.

Key highlights of the Company’s 2018 achievements and success include achieving all primary and key secondary endpoints in our Phase 3 studies of HTX-011; filing the New Drug Application (“NDA”) with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and obtaining Breakthrough Therapy and Priority Review designations for HTX-011; and exceeding our commercial sales targets for the Chemotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting (“CINV”) portfolio including SUSTOL^® (granisetron) extended-release injection (“SUSTOL”) and CINVANTI^® (aprepitant) injectable emulsion (“CINVANTI”). These achievements and others created greater stockholder value and expanded the opportunity for future growth and long-term success.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our goal is to provide a competitive total compensation package with significant emphasis on paying for performance. Our corporate compensation philosophy targets annual base salary and annual incentive bonus payout percentage at or near the 50^th percentile of the market, and equity awards at or near the 75^th percentile of the market when compared to executives with similar roles at similar organizations. We favor equity-based compensation (which, to date, consists only of stock options) and variable incentive awards over guaranteed cash compensation in order to drive accomplishments that enhance stockholder value and align the interests of our executives and our stockholders. This means that our executives will not realize the total potential value of their compensation package unless performance goals, the significant majority of which are directly tied to our corporate performance, are achieved. The Compensation Committee believes that our executive compensation program is appropriately designed and reasonable in light of the executive compensation programs of our peer-group companies. The Compensation Committee also believes that our executive compensation program is appropriate in that it is designed to incentivize our management team to achieve our short-term and long-term corporate objectives while effectively managing business risks and challenges.

25

In implementing the foregoing objectives, our executive compensation program is based on three primary components: (i) base salary; (ii) annual cash incentive bonuses and (iii) equity-based compensation. The Compensation Committee believes that compensation in the form of base salary and an annual cash incentive bonus provides our executives with short-term rewards for success in operational performance and meeting established goals and business responsibilities, while compensation through equity awards aligns the objectives of our management team with those of our stockholders with respect to long-term performance and success. In addition, our executives receive benefits that are generally available to all our employees. The Compensation Committee’s process for setting compensation includes reviewing the targeted overall compensation for each executive and then allocating that compensation between base salary, annual cash incentive bonuses and equity-based compensation with reference to the competitive market peer-company data as well as market survey data for public companies of a similar size and market capitalization and at a similar stage of product development and business activity.

Risk Management and Mitigation

In reviewing our compensation structure in 2018, the Compensation Committee also considered whether our compensation policies and practices could affect our risk profile and whether such compensation policies and practices could potentially encourage excessive risk taking by our employees. More specifically, thought was given to the general design philosophy of our policies for employees whose conduct would be most affected by the incentives established under our compensation programs. In considering these issues, the Compensation Committee did not find that our compensation policies and other policies generally raised undue risks for the Company or potentially could encourage excessive risk taking by our employees.

With respect to cash incentive bonuses and equity-based compensation for our executive officers, the amount of an individual’s bonus or award depends principally on overall Company performance, which reduces the incentive for an individual to take undue individual risks in an effort to increase the amount of his or her cash bonus or equity award for a particular year. The Company’s performance goals are reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of each year to ensure that they are appropriate and would not encourage or reward excessive risk taking. Additionally, the Compensation Committee monitors Company performance periodically throughout the year and has the opportunity to intervene in the event that actions by individual employees with respect to the Company’s performance goal attainment would raise undue risk.

With respect to new hire equity awards, these awards typically vest and become exercisable over a period of four years, consisting of an initial one-year cliff vest, followed by monthly vesting. With respect to ongoing equity awards, these awards typically vest and become exercisable ratably each month over a four-year period. We believe that long-term value creation, contrasted with short-term gain, presents the best opportunity for our employees to profit from these awards. In circumstances where performance-based equity awards have been granted, the events that trigger vesting are generally estimated to be achieved at least one or more years from the grant date.

Consideration of Most Recent Stockholder Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation

In 2018, the percentage of votes cast “For” our advisory say-on-pay vote to approve the Company’s Named Executive Officer compensation was 90.7% of the total votes cast. The Board and Compensation Committee believe that our 2018 say-on-pay results are an affirmation of the effectiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program and, therefore, no changes were made to the structure and elements of the executive compensation program based on the 2018 say-on-pay vote results.

26

Roles in Determining Compensation

Compensation Committee

For 2018, the Compensation Committee had the responsibility of reviewing the appropriateness of the target total compensation of our executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee engaged in this evaluation while also considering whether the compensation program was achieving its objectives consistent with our compensation philosophy. The Compensation Committee oversaw and approved all compensation arrangements and actions for our executive officers and other key employees in 2018, including the Named Executive Officers. While the Compensation Committee drew on a number of resources, including input from the Chief Executive Officer, to make decisions regarding the Company’s executive compensation program, ultimate decision-making authority rested with the Compensation Committee. The members of the Compensation Committee relied on their judgment in making compensation decisions after reviewing our overall performance and evaluating each executive’s performance and overall contributions during the year against established goals, operational performance and business responsibilities.

Compensation Consultant

In 2018, the Compensation Committee engaged the services of Compensia, Inc. (“Compensia”), a national independent compensation advisory firm that has extensive experience with biotechnology companies and specializes in executive compensation. The directive for Compensia was to assist the Compensation Committee in its review of executive and director compensation practices, including the competitiveness of pay levels, executive compensation design and review and analysis of competitive market data with respect to the Company’s peers in the industry. The Compensation Committee has the final authority to engage and terminate services for consultants it may engage. The decision to engage Compensia was not made or recommended by our management, and Compensia did not provide any services to us outside of its services to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee, after a review of the factors set forth in Section 10C(b)(2) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10C-1(b)(4) under the Exchange Act, has determined that the work performed by Compensia did not present any conflicts of interest.

Chief Executive Officer

In 2018, our Chief Executive Officer attended Compensation Committee meetings at which executive compensation (other than our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation) was discussed, and he worked with the Compensation Committee to develop compensation recommendations for the executive officers (apart from himself and our former President), based on individual experience and breadth of knowledge, internal considerations, individual performance during the relevant year and other factors deemed relevant by the Compensation Committee. The Chief Executive Officer’s input was one of the factors considered by the Compensation Committee in determining overall compensation for the other Named Executive Officers (apart from our former President) and other key employees. The Compensation Committee used Compensia’s analysis to formulate compensation recommendations for the Chief Executive Officer and also for our former President. Discussions regarding compensation for our Chief Executive Officer and our former President were held by the Compensation Committee in an executive session.

27

Competitive Market Review

In 2018, the Compensation Committee retained Compensia to assist with identifying a group of peer companies within the biotechnology/biopharmaceutical industry with similar identified characteristics to our Company to be used to assess compensation levels for the top senior management positions and non-employee directors. Compensia was involved with the process of selecting an appropriate peer group for our Company and in collecting and analyzing compensation data of the companies within our peer group. In addition, for some positions, we reviewed other broader market surveys within our industry. While we do not establish compensation levels based solely on comparative data, pay practices at other companies are an important factor that are considered in assessing the reasonableness of compensation and ensuring that our compensation practices are competitive in the marketplace.

In developing the peer group for 2018, the criteria that were used to identify the peer companies were market capitalization (ranging from $900 million to $3.6 billion) and current stage of product development or business activity (at the commercialization stage or close to potential commercialization). The 15 companies in the peer group for 2018 are listed below.

While the Compensation Committee reviewed compensation data pertaining to these companies, it determined that elements such as the Company’s diversity of clinical development activities and the level of executive experience should also be significant factors in assessing compensation levels.

Compensation Elements

Base Salary

Executive base salaries are based on job responsibilities, accountability and the experience of the individual. For 2018, the Compensation Committee sought to implement a policy of targeting base salaries for our executives, including the Chief Executive Officer and the former President, at or near the 50^th percentile of salaries of executives with similar roles at similar organizations, based on its review of competitive market data. In its assessment of executive compensation levels, Compensia provided an analysis that confirmed, using the Company’s identified peer group and broader industry and market survey data for life sciences companies, that our executive base salaries and target total cash compensation approximated the 50^th percentile. Through review of the data provided, the Compensation Committee determined that base salaries for the Named Executive Officers appeared to be generally aligned with our compensation philosophy as described above.

28

More specifically, during its review of base salaries for our executives, the Compensation Committee primarily considered:

The Compensation Committee considered these factors in the aggregate, without assigning weight to any specific factor.

Base salary levels are typically considered annually as part of our performance review process, as well as on promotion or other change in job responsibilities. Merit increases are awarded based on the Compensation Committee’s overall review of an executive’s performance of his or her job responsibilities. In addition, base salaries are reviewed annually for comparability with market practices. Market adjustments generally are reserved for those whose base salaries are substantially below market. In December 2018, the Board approved the following base salary increases for 2019 based on performance during 2018:

These salary adjustments were effective commencing with the first pay period in 2019 and were generally in line with merit increases across the Company. Mr. Hoffman’s salary increase included a market adjustment due to his salary being below market benchmarks.

Annual Cash Incentive Bonus

The Compensation Committee, consistent with the overall corporate philosophy of maintaining target total cash compensation for our executives at or near the 50^th percentile when compared to executives with similar roles at similar organizations, reviewed the target annual cash incentive bonus payouts for the Named Executive Officers based on peer group and broader industry and market survey data. The target annual incentive bonus amount is set at a level based on the executive’s accountability and potential impact on the Company’s performance. Accordingly, the more control and accountability that an executive

29

has over the Company’s performance, the greater the percentage of that executive’s total target cash compensation is dependent on annual performance-based cash bonus awards.

The target annual cash incentive bonus payout percentages for 2018 set at the beginning of the year were as follows: 60% of base salary for Dr. Quart and Mr. Rosen; 50% of base salary for Ms. Manhard; and 40% of base salary for Mr. Hoffman. For Dr. Quart, Mr. Rosen, Ms. Manhard and Mr. Hoffman, the target annual cash incentive bonus payout percentages for 2018 were based solely on the achievement of corporate performance goals. These target percentages were unchanged from 2017.

In determining the actual annual cash incentive bonus payout for our executive officers, the executive’s annual base salary is multiplied by his or her target annual incentive bonus payout percentage. For Dr. Quart, Mr. Rosen, Ms. Manhard and Mr. Hoffman, the resulting amount is then multiplied by the corporate performance percentage approved by the Compensation Committee or Board, which is dependent on the achievement of corporate performance goals.

For annual cash incentive bonuses for our executive officers, a minimum overall goal achievement of greater than or equal to 50% is required for an executive officer to earn any performance-based cash bonus. The target annual cash incentive bonus can be earned if a goal achievement of 100% is obtained; for extraordinary performance in corporate goal achievement, up to 150% of the target annual cash incentive bonus for that goal may be awarded. Accordingly, for each executive in 2018, there was the potential to receive up to 150% of his or her overall target annual cash incentive bonus payout. The Compensation Committee retains broad discretion to modify our target corporate performance goals at any time, including the methodology for calculating the specific bonus amounts. The Compensation Committee may also, in its sole discretion, determine to either increase annual cash incentive bonus payouts for extraordinary achievement or to reduce payouts if economic and business conditions warrant.

Our corporate goals are collectively designed to emphasize success with respect to our diverse business efforts and encourage our executives to support each goal as a multi-disciplinary function. For 2018, our corporate goals were a combination of the following: (1) achieving all primary and key secondary endpoints in pivotal Phase 3 trials; (2) filing the NDA for HTX-011; (3) filing the sNDA for CINVANTI IV push; (3) completion of certain pre-commercialization efforts with respect to HTX-011; (4) exceeding certain commercial sales targets for SUSTOL and CINVANTI; and (5) financing goals, including adhering to an on-target budget. Although these goals were assigned weights, the Compensation Committee’s analysis of the level of achievement for each goal was subjective and the goals were considered in the aggregate, without a formulaic evaluation. In the aggregate, the Compensation Committee determined that overall, the corporate performance goals had been achieved at a level of 150% due to better than expected results for the Company’s key goals.

30

Performance-based cash bonuses for Dr. Quart, Mr. Rosen, Ms. Manhard and Mr. Hoffman were approved based on the achievement of corporate performance goals and, therefore, paid at 150% of their target annual cash incentive bonus amount, corresponding to payouts as follows:

Equity-Based Compensation

Our equity-based compensation program is designed to promote high performance and achievement of corporate goals by employees on a long-term basis, encourage the growth of stockholder value and allow employees to participate in the long-term success of the Company. Under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, the Board (or a committee thereof, including the Compensation Committee) may grant stock options, shares of stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights and performance awards. In granting these equity awards, the Board (or a committee thereof, including the Compensation Committee) may establish any conditions or restrictions it deems appropriate.

To date, we have granted equity awards to our executive officers and other employees in the form of stock options. By using stock options, the Compensation Committee has provided the members of the management team with a significant equity stake in our Company, which we believe aligns the long-term interests of the management team with our stockholders. Because a financial gain from stock options is only possible if the market price of the Company’s common stock increases over time, the Compensation Committee believes that option grants motivate our executives and other employees to deliver superior performance and focus on behaviors and initiatives that lead to long-term value creation, which benefits all of our stockholders. The Company typically grants time-based vesting options, but has also granted performance-based options to our Chief Executive Officer, our former President and certain other executives.

Stock option award levels are based on option grant guidelines approved by the Board or the Compensation Committee and vary among employees based on their level within the Company and their individual performance. Annual awards of stock options to executives are made as part of the annual review of executive performance, which typically occurs around year-end. Newly hired or promoted executives receive their award of stock options on their date of hire or promotion. For 2018, the Compensation Committee targeted stock option award levels for our executives, including the Chief Executive Officer and the former President, at or near the 75^th percentile of long-term incentive awards of executives with similar roles at similar organizations, based on a review of competitive market data. The Compensation Committee, in line with the Company’s philosophy to encourage long-term value creation, elected to emphasize the equity portion of each executive’s overall target total direct compensation opportunity by benchmarking above the 50^th percentile for this compensation element. The grant of options by the Company is unrelated to any anticipated major announcements made by the Company and is not influenced by any material, non-public information that may exist at the time of grant.

31

In December 2018, annual equity awards were granted to each of our Named Executive Officers, who were then employed by the Company, after consideration to the performance and achievements by each executive during 2018 and their future anticipated impact on the success of the organization. Annual equity awards vest ratably each month over a four-year period. In determining the appropriate value of each of these awards, the Compensation Committee used the market analysis and peer group data developed with the assistance of Compensia, as discussed above. With respect to each Named Executive Officer, the peer-group data and survey data for companies in our industry with similar market capitalization was used to help set the appropriate value of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

Employee Benefit Programs

The Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in the Company’s health, welfare, paid time-off, retirement savings and employee stock purchase benefit programs on the same terms as are available to other employees. These benefit programs are designed to enable the Company to attract and retain its workforce in a competitive marketplace. The retirement savings plan helps employees save and prepare financially for retirement. Our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) provides employees with an opportunity for increased equity ownership in the Company. Other than these benefits generally available to all employees, Named Executive Officers do not receive any other benefits or perquisites.

Our retirement savings plan (“401(k) Plan”) is a tax-qualified retirement savings plan, pursuant to which all employees, including the Named Executive Officers, are able to contribute the lesser of 100% of their annual compensation (as defined) or the limit prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service to the 401(k) Plan on a pre-tax basis. In 2018, we matched employee contributions to the 401(k) Plan in an amount equal to 50% of each participant’s contribution during the plan year, up to a maximum amount equal to the lesser of either: (a) 3% of each participant’s annual compensation; or (b) $8,250.

Our ESPP allows employees, including the Named Executive Officers, to voluntarily purchase common stock under the ESPP twice per calendar year (up to 10% of each employee’s base salary, hourly compensation and any cash bonus paid, subject to certain limitations) over the six-month offering period at 85% of the fair market value of the common stock at specified dates.

Employment and Separation Arrangements

We have entered into employment agreements with each Named Executive Officer, the terms of which provide, among other things, for certain termination and change-in-control payments and benefits. Our Board approved the termination and change-in-control payments and benefits in order to maintain market-competitive compensation practices and to mitigate some of the risk that exists for executives working in a biopharmaceutical company at our current stage of development, where the

32

possibility exists that we may be acquired if our business efforts succeed. These arrangements are intended to retain highly skilled executives who have, or who may seek, alternatives that may appear to them to be less risky in terms of the potential loss of their position following a merger or sale, particularly where the services of these executive officers may not be required by the acquirer. We do not provide any of our executives with gross-up protection for “golden parachute” excise taxes in any of these arrangements

A summary of the terms of each of the arrangements we have with any Named Executive Officer who is currently employed by the Company and the potential value of the payments and benefits on termination of employment or change in control is provided in this Proxy Statement under the headings “Employment Arrangements” and “Payments on Termination or Change in Control.”

Tax Considerations

In making compensation decisions affecting our executive officers, the Compensation Committee considers our ability to deduct, under applicable federal corporate income tax law, compensation payments made to executives. Specifically, the Compensation Committee considers the requirements and impact of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), which limits the tax deductibility to us of compensation in excess of $1.0 million in any year for certain executive officers.

For 2017 and prior years, Section 162(m) included an exception from the deductibility limitation for qualified “performance-based compensation.” This exception, however, has been repealed by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 for tax years beginning in 2018. As such, compensation paid to certain of our executive officers in excess of $1.0 million will not be deductible unless it qualifies for certain transition relief applicable for compensation paid pursuant to a written binding contract that was in effect as of November 2, 2017. The Compensation Committee believes that stockholder interests are best served by not restricting the Compensation Committee’s discretion and flexibility in structuring compensation programs, even if such compensation results in non-deductible expenses under applicable law.

Trading Policy

We maintain an Insider Trading and Trading Window Policy that, among other things, prohibits our officers, including our Named Executive Officers, directors and employees from engaging in short sales, hedging of stock ownership positions and transactions involving derivative securities relating to our common stock. The policy does not provide for exceptions from these rules.

Minimum Stock Ownership Requirements

There are no minimum stock ownership guidelines for our executives or employees, although senior members of our management team are encouraged and expected to have a significant direct interest in the value of our common stock through the receipt of equity awards and/or open market purchases, as the case may be. We strive to design our compensation program to stress long-term ownership in Company equity as the means of best aligning the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders.

33

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

34

Summary Compensation Table

The following tables and descriptive materials set forth information concerning compensation earned for services rendered to us by our Named Executive Officers during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.

35

Grants of Plan-based Awards Table

The following table sets forth certain information regarding grants of plan-based awards to the Named Executive Officers during the year ended December 31, 2018:

36

Outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31, 2018 Table

The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding equity awards held by our Named Executive Officers at December 31, 2018:

37

Option Exercises Table

The following table provides information regarding the number of shares of common stock acquired and the value realized pursuant to the exercise of stock options during 2018 by each of the Named Executive Officers.

Non-qualified Defined Contribution and Other Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

We do not maintain either a non-qualified defined contribution or non-qualified deferred compensation plan.

38

Potential Payments on Termination or Change in Control

Employment Arrangements

Below are descriptions of the material terms of the employment arrangements entered into with our current Named Executive Officers.

Barry Quart, Pharm.D.

In connection with his appointment as Chief Executive Officer, the Company entered into an executive employment agreement with Barry Quart, Pharm.D. on May 1, 2013 (“Quart Agreement”). Certain provisions of the Quart Agreement were amended by the Compensation Committee in April 2015. The Quart Agreement initially provided Dr. Quart with a base salary of $525,000 annually, which was raised to $540,750 annually for 2014, to $551,565 annually for 2015, to $579,143 annually for 2016, to $596,518 annually for 2017, to $614,414 annually for 2018 and to $638,991 annually for 2019. Dr. Quart was also initially eligible for an annual target cash incentive bonus in an amount equal to 55% of his base salary, which was increased to 60% of his base salary effective beginning with the 2016 annual cash incentive bonus.

Additionally, the Quart Agreement, as amended, provides that if Dr. Quart’s employment is terminated by the Company without “Cause,” or by Dr. Quart for “Good Reason” (each as defined in the Quart Agreement), then he shall be entitled to receive: (i) a lump-sum payment equal to the sum of his annual base salary then in effect and his target performance bonus then in effect, less required deductions and withholdings; and (ii) accelerated time-based vesting of shares subject to all stock awards issued by the Company, for the number of shares that would have vested accordingly had he continued employment with the Company for a period of 12 months after termination (which includes partial accelerated vesting of awards subject to time-vesting, but does not include awards that remain subject to performance criteria as of the date of termination). The Company also agreed to reimburse for or continue to pay for health care benefits during the 18 months after the date of termination, or, if sooner, such date when he is no longer eligible for such benefits under applicable law. Per the Quart Agreement, in the event Dr. Quart’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause, or if he resigns for Good Reason within three months before, or within 18 months following, a Change in Control (as defined) of the Company, then, in lieu of the above benefits, Dr. Quart would be entitled to receive: (i) a lump sum payment equal to 150% of his annual base salary then in effect, less required deductions and withholdings; and (ii) the greater of his target performance bonus then in effect, less required deductions and withholdings, or his performance bonus paid in the year preceding the year in which termination occurs, less required deductions and withholdings; and (iii) reimbursement for or continued payment of health care benefits during the 18 months after the date of termination, or such earlier date when he is no longer eligible for such benefits under applicable law. In addition, on the closing of a Change in Control transaction, Dr. Quart is entitled to immediate vesting of 100% of any outstanding and unvested performance-based equity awards and immediate vesting of 50% of any outstanding and unvested time-based equity awards. Following the closing of any such Change in Control, the remaining 50% of time-based equity awards are eligible to vest on the earlier of (a) the executive’s qualifying involuntary termination of employment or (b) six months following the completion of the Change in Control subject to his voluntary continued employment through such date.

Kimberly Manhard

In connection with her appointment as Executive Vice President, Drug Development on January 28, 2016, the Company entered into an executive employment agreement with Kimberly Manhard (“Manhard Agreement”). The Manhard Agreement

39

initially provided Ms. Manhard with a base salary of $440,000 annually, which was increased to $453,200 annually for 2017, to $466,796 annually for 2018 and to $490,136 annually for 2019. Ms. Manhard is also eligible for an annual target incentive bonus in an amount equal to 50% of her base salary.

Additionally, the Manhard Agreement provides that if Ms. Manhard’s employment is terminated by the Company without “Cause,” (as defined in the Manhard Agreement), or by Ms. Manhard for “Good Reason” (as defined in the Manhard Agreement), then she shall be entitled to receive: (i) a lump-sum payment equal to the sum of her annual base salary then in effect and her target performance bonus then in effect, less required deductions and withholdings; and (ii) accelerated time-based vesting of shares subject to all stock awards issued by the Company, for the number of shares which would have vested accordingly had she continued employment with the Company for a period of 12 months after termination. The Company also agreed to reimburse for, or continue to pay for, health care benefits during the 12 months after the date of termination, or such date when he is no longer eligible for such benefits under applicable law. In the event Ms. Manhard’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause, or if she resigns for Good Reason within three months before, or within 18 months following, a Change in Control (as defined in the Manhard Agreement) of the Company, then, in lieu of the above benefits, Ms. Manhard shall be entitled to receive: (i) a lump-sum payment equal to her annual base salary then in effect, less required deductions and withholdings; (ii) the greater of her target performance bonus then in effect, less required deductions and withholdings, or her performance bonus paid in the year preceding the year in which termination occurs, less required deductions and withholdings; and (iii) accelerated vesting of 100% of any outstanding and unvested stock awards held by Ms. Manhard at such time (including both time-based and performance-based stock awards). The Company also agreed to reimburse for, or continue to pay for, health care benefits during the 12 months after the date of termination following a Change in Control, or such date when she is no longer eligible for such benefits under applicable law.

Robert Hoffman

In connection with his appointment as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Finance, the Company entered into an executive employment agreement with Robert Hoffman on April 24, 2017 (“Hoffman Agreement”). The Hoffman Agreement initially provided Mr. Hoffman with a base salary of $350,000 annually, which was increased to $357,438 annually for 2018 and to $388,714 annually for 2019. Mr. Hoffman is also eligible for an annual cash incentive bonus in an amount equal to 40% of his base salary

Additionally, the Hoffman Agreement provides that if Mr. Hoffman’s employment is terminated by the Company without “Cause,” (as defined in the Hoffman Agreement), or by Mr. Hoffman for “Good Reason” (as defined in the Hoffman Agreement), then he shall be entitled to receive: (i) a lump-sum payment equal to the sum of his annual base salary then in effect and his target performance bonus then in effect, less required deductions and withholdings; and (ii) accelerated time-based vesting of shares subject to all stock awards issued by the Company, for the number of shares which would have vested accordingly had he continued employment with the Company for a period of 12 months after termination. The Company also agreed to reimburse for, or continue to pay for, health care benefits during the 12 months after the date of termination, or such date when he is no longer eligible for such benefits under applicable law. In the event Mr. Hoffman’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause, or if he resigns for Good Reason within three months before, or within 18 months following, a Change in Control (as defined in the Hoffman Agreement) of the Company, then, in lieu of the above benefits, Mr. Hoffman shall be entitled to receive: (i) a lump-sum payment equal to his annual base salary then in effect, less required deductions and

40

withholdings; (ii) the greater of his target performance bonus then in effect, less required deductions and withholdings, or his performance bonus paid in the year preceding the year in which termination occurs, less required deductions and withholdings; and (iii) accelerated vesting of 100% of any outstanding and unvested stock awards held by Mr. Hoffman at such time (including both time-based and performance-based stock awards). The Company also agreed to reimburse for, or continue to pay for, health care benefits during the 12 months after the date of termination following a Change in Control, or such date when he is no longer eligible for such benefits under applicable law.

The descriptions of executive employment agreements provided above under the heading “Employment Arrangements” set forth the potential payments on termination or change in control for our current Named Executive Officers. The following table sets forth information regarding potential payments that would have been made to our Named Executive Officers Dr. Quart, Ms. Manhard and Mr. Hoffman on various termination or change in control events assuming such events occurred as of December 31, 2018.

41

Robert Rosen

Following Mr. Rosen’s retirement in February 2019, Mr. Rosen was entitled to certain benefits equivalent to those set forth in Section 4.4.2 of his employment agreement, as amended. Additionally, Mr. Rosen remains eligible for vesting of certain performance-based stock options based on the achievement of a commercial milestone. Additionally, the Company has agreed to provide a six-month exercise period for Mr. Rosen’s vested equity awards.

CEO Pay Ratio

As required in Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act, the Company must disclose the ratio of the annual total compensation of the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) to that of the median-paid employee (“CEO Pay Ratio”). Annual total compensation consists of base salary, annual cash incentive bonus, grant-date fair value of equity awards and all other compensation earned. For the year ended December 31, 2018:

The CEO Pay Ratio was 14 to 1. The CEO Pay Ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company experienced an increase in its employee population of approximately 38% that we believe would result in a significant change to the Company’s prior year CEO Pay Ratio. As a result, we identified a new median-paid employee for fiscal year 2018 based on the Company’s employee population as of December 3, 2018, which was the date the Company hired its last new employee in 2018. To identify the median-paid employee, we calculated the annual compensation of each of the 187 employees who were employed as of December 3, 2018, excluding the CEO, as the sum of: (1) base salary earned in 2018, which is either the annual salary for salaried employees or the estimated annual salary for hourly employees; (2) annual cash incentive bonus earned in 2018; and (3) grant-date fair value of equity awards granted in 2018, computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. Retirement and other benefits were not included in this calculation. We then selected the employee who was at the median of this population, whose annual total compensation is reflected above to calculate the CEO Pay Ratio.

42

CEO Pay Ratios for those of our peer companies who have disclosed them as of April 22, 2019 are set forth in the table below. The average CEO Pay Ratio for our peer companies listed below is 27:1.

Director Compensation

Our employee directors do not receive any compensation for their service as members of our Board.

In 2018, the Board engaged Compensia to conduct an assessment of our Board compensation program as compared to the same peer group used for purposes of reviewing our executive compensation program. The annual cash retainer paid to non-employee members of our Board for general service approximates the 50^th percentile of our peer companies and equity-based compensation approximates the 75^th percentile of our peer companies. Our Board compensation program differs from many peer companies in that pay for participating on committees of the Board is provided solely through stock option grants instead of cash retainers. The use of stock option grants further enhances our non-employee Board members’ long-term equity stake in the Company. Moreover, because the realization of financial gain from stock option grants is conditioned on the continued increase of the price of the Company’s common stock, the Company believes that stock option grants encourage our directors to engage in behaviors and implement initiatives that lead to long-term value creation that benefits all of the Company’s stockholders. Our average total direct compensation per director, including remunerations for committee service, approximates the 50^th percentile.

The Board approved the following compensation for non-employee directors:

Cash Compensation

43

Equity-Based Compensation (shares underlying options)

The following table includes compensation for services provided by our non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2018: